http://forum.madebyfrog.com/rss en-us 25 <p>LOL</p> <p>Thank you for the <em>lively</em> discussion. :)</p> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:44:52 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1168 charlie http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1168 <p>it is with everything the same: &lt;b&gt;who does not go with time, goes sometime!&lt;/b&gt; hopefully i translated that "say" right:</p> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:37:36 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1166 aroundthefur http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1166 <p>Hello! :) Well, in answer to your question(s). I suppose this argument is a little like arguing which OS is better. The bottom line for me; WHY do I <em>have</em> to change to a different version of PHP on one of my 50 servers. When I can (and am) already doing everything that PHP5 offers on a PHP4 install? Because some dev bought the bill of goods, and PHP5 is the be-all-to-end-all? OK, maybe that wasn't fair. The dev may just prefer to code PHP5 style. But, to an and user, this just seems a bit unfair. The PHP devs <em>need</em> ppl to switch to a different version because they need to keep ppl active, and interested in PHP - they depend on it. But, quite frankly; their choice to make such a drastic change in v.5 came from the funding SUN microsystems provided - notice the similatities between Java* and PHP? Anyway, v.5 doesn't provide anything worth mentioning that v.4 can't already accomplish - <em>really</em>.</p> <p>So, as far as the frog situation is concerned for me. I simply dug up a library I built a couple of years ago to overcome this exact same problem with a wiki that insisted would only run on v.5. I am now using it on frog via a php prepend statement in the .htaccess file. Now I've wrapped all those v.5 only functions, and everything works the way I want it to. :)</p> <p>Best wishes.</p> <p>--Charlie</p> <p>P.S. Did I forget to mention that v.5 has more issues than v.4, and that Apache <em>still</em> hasn't convinced the majority to switch to v.2 after 5yrs.? :)</p> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 03:58:16 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1165 charlie http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1165 <p>but when almost every host provides php5, the required php version of an apllication isnt a factor for choosing. sometimes i think its more stupid when an apllication (many at these days) only runs with mod_rewrite! but cant you choose php5 on your host? is it payed space?</p> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:12:42 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1164 aroundthefur http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1164 <p>Yes. many (maybe even most) hosting co.'s offer both. But, the key here is <em>both</em>. If given the choice to use an application that runs on <em>either</em> php4, or php5. Or one that runs <em>only</em> on php5; which one will be chosen? :)</p> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:59:18 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1163 charlie http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1163 <p>the majority uses 5 i think, almost every hoster have updated to 5 or gives the option to change! for example. i have to choose for my domain to use php4 or php 5! :-)</p> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:37:37 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1161 aroundthefur http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1161 <p>WHY IS THIS REQUIREMENT NOT LISTED IN THE DOCUMENTATION? The documentation link on the frog home page dose not state anything about the requirements I see listed here. The only information listed for requirements I found were: PHP,MySQL, and Apache/IIS. Thank you in advance for the +b+mis+b+information. :( I just spent 2hrs. attempting to install the svn version, then failing to the 0.92 version - all for nothing. :( I +b+firmly+b+ believe this was a poor decision for frog. The majority users still use PHP4. Hosting companies are required to support both 4 &amp; 5, but developers are not? I guess I should just grab an older copy of frog that supports PHP4 and bring it up to what it is now, and add features that I have already developed for other CMS's. Then we'll see which version is more popular - the version that supports PHP4 +b+&amp;+b+ PHP5, or the version which only supports PHP5. Anyone care to guess which version will win?</p> Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:09:47 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1159 charlie http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_1159 <p>I can't. You said it wont run on PHP 4. :(</p> Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:08:58 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_735 bugger http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_735 <p>if you only have mysql 3 I have never tested it, you can test it in a temporary directory then told me if it works :)</p> Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:18:18 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_728 philippe http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_728 <p>Do you need MySQL 4?</p> Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:05:40 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_725 bugger http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_725 <p>the last version is 0.9.1 ( the real stable version will be the version 1 ) but the 0.9.1 is the more stable version for the moment. and now it doesn't require innoDB, but you need PHP 5 ( if you have PDO installed you can use sqlite 3 too ) and I recommend you the svn version ( I have fixed a bug in the sqlite 3 plugins for making the archive of article work perfectly like with mysql.</p> Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:53:35 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_723 philippe http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_723 <p>I have a site thats running with PHP &amp; MySQL 4 that I would like to convert to frog but im not sure if it will work.</p> <p>The site says the latest stable version is 0.2.2.</p> <p>What are the exact requirements for frog 0.9.1 to work? Will it work with a server running PHP &amp; MySQL 4? Does frog still need InnoDB to work?</p> Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:50:19 +0000 http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_722 bugger http://forum.madebyfrog.com/topic/153?page=1#post_722